Date: Sun, 21 Nov 1999 10:25:52 +0200 (IST)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender: eliz AT is
To: Jochen Palmer <jpalmer AT myokay DOT net>
cc: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: AT&T assembler PLEASE HELP
In-Reply-To: <000801bf3367$5549a100$0100a8c0@terminator>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.991121102525.25798T@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


On Sat, 20 Nov 1999, Jochen Palmer wrote:

> Error: no such 386 instruction: 'pushfd'.=20
> 
> But that's not true. I know I have to use a diffrent syntax fot AT&T =
> assembler compared to Intel assembler, but what should I use instead of =
> 'popfd' ? 'shr' for example worked without problems.=20

Use either pushfl ot just pushf (and similarly for popf).