From: broeker AT acp3bf DOT knirsch DOT de (Hans-Bernhard Broeker)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: DPMI hosts
Date: 12 Nov 1999 17:04:27 +0100
Organization: RWTH Aachen, III. physikalisches Institut B
Lines: 15
Message-ID: <80hdqb$ll1@acp3bf.knirsch.de>
References: <382A8128 DOT BAF9901A AT virtualis DOT com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: acp3bf.physik.rwth-aachen.de
X-Trace: nets3.rz.RWTH-Aachen.DE 942422671 10446 137.226.32.75 (12 Nov 1999 16:04:31 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse AT rwth-aachen DOT de
NNTP-Posting-Date: 12 Nov 1999 16:04:31 GMT
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Alex Mendes da Costa (alexmdc AT virtualis DOT com) wrote:
> Hi all.

> I don't know much in general and was wondering how you say which dpmi
> host you want to use, like if I wanted to use the windows 9x one instead
> of cwsdpmi.

That's simple: you can't do that, at least not for the
Win9x-integrated DPMI host. Except for the case of raw DOS, the DPMI
host *is* already running, it has (and needs!) total control of the
machine, effectively. No other DPMI host can run inside an existing
one.
-- 
Hans-Bernhard Broeker (broeker AT physik DOT rwth-aachen DOT de)
Even if all the snow were burnt, ashes would remain.