From: "BP" Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp References: <9mmT3.825$cn1 DOT 10505 AT typhoon-sf DOT snfc21 DOT pbi DOT net> Subject: Re: A few quasi-newbie questions Lines: 42 Organization: EAC X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 Message-ID: Date: Wed, 3 Nov 1999 01:44:02 -0800 NNTP-Posting-Host: 216.66.139.27 X-Complaints-To: abuse AT direct DOT ca X-Trace: brie.direct.ca 941621404 216.66.139.27 (Wed, 03 Nov 1999 01:30:04 PST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 03 Nov 1999 01:30:04 PST To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Response to Question 1: Rhide 1.4.7 stable? I've tried it. It has some bug fixes such as being able to compile a file in a different directory, and a bug with the default rhide options. I would use it, but it always crashes on my machine after these two steps: compiling anything and then exiting Rhide. I get a SIGSEGV error message. So, I use Rhide 14b. You'll just have to try it out yourself, I guess. Probably be a good idea to back up your entire djgpp directory before doing so, in case something unpredicatable occurs. StarWeaver wrote in message news:9mmT3.825$cn1 DOT 10505 AT typhoon-sf DOT snfc21 DOT pbi DOT net... > While i'm still finding the whole DJGPP um, 'suite' to be a brainfull, i think > i've gotten the hang of most of it (I'm absolutily not new to either windows > or dos, or C :) i still have a few questions: > > (BTW thanks for the umpteen messages about -lstdcx & rhide, didn't even need > to ask... missed it in the faq too...) > > 1. Is RHIDE 1.4.7 stable enough to use? I would love to have the latest > version but i don't know hoew buggy the beta is. > > 2. You're not supposed to use libg++ anymore, yet 'gxx' requires it. Solution: > Don't use 'gxx' ? > > 3. LibStdCxx seems to have less than spectacular documentation. I know how to > find a referance on STL and IOstreams (Which is what the faq said, i think), > but what about the several dozen headers in lang/cxx that don't seem to > involve either of those packages? (I.E. IOstreams donsen't take up many > headers i don't think, and i've found a lot of odd ones that arent listed in > the SGI/STL library information) > > Thanks for any help, sorry for any rambling... > > -StarWeaver Blue