From: "Hammy" Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp Subject: Re: nearptr enabled? Date: Thu, 21 Oct 1999 01:52:01 +0100 Organization: Customer of Planet Online Lines: 28 Message-ID: <7ulo3f$5kb$1@news4.svr.pol.co.uk> References: <7ukvol$a00$1 AT news5 DOT svr DOT pol DOT co DOT uk> NNTP-Posting-Host: modem-105.trazodone.dialup.pol.co.uk X-Trace: news4.svr.pol.co.uk 940467119 5771 62.136.89.233 (21 Oct 1999 00:51:59 GMT) NNTP-Posting-Date: 21 Oct 1999 00:51:59 GMT X-Complaints-To: abuse AT theplanet DOT net X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com i would do it a safe way, but I dont understand it. Besides, I hear it was slower using the farpokey things Damian Yerrick wrote in message news:BypP3.553$zO DOT 17217 AT dfiatx1-snr1 DOT gtei DOT net... > > Hammy wrote in message > news:7ukvol$a00$1 AT news5 DOT svr DOT pol DOT co DOT uk... > > im using some code that use nearptrs? I think it > > does anyway, yet i can find any reference to the > > djgpp_nearptr_enable thing? so, does it mean it is > > using nearptrs? I access the videoram with a regular ptr > > > > video[where]=col > > That's nearptr. If you use this hack, you must be *very* > careful not to step on another program's memory. > > -- > Damian Yerrick > CM 398, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology > 5500 Wabash Ave > Terre Haute, IN 47803 > http://come.to/yerrick > >