From: "Johan Venter" <jventer AT writeme DOT com>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
References: <19991012053219 DOT 9064 DOT rocketmail AT web1402 DOT mail DOT yahoo DOT com>
Subject: Re: allegro gone missing?
Lines: 18
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
Message-ID: <lAFM3.3249$_4.5461@newsfeeds.bigpond.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 1999 22:06:24 +1000
NNTP-Posting-Host: 139.134.162.96
X-Trace: newsfeeds.bigpond.com 939730321 139.134.162.96 (Tue, 12 Oct 1999 22:12:01 EST)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 12 Oct 1999 22:12:01 EST
Organization: Telstra BigPond Internet Services (http://www.bigpond.com)
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Prashant TR <prashant_news AT yahoo DOT com> wrote in message
news:19991012053219 DOT 9064 DOT rocketmail AT web1402 DOT mail DOT yahoo DOT com...
>
> The speed is due to file cacheing and other features
> of Windows 95. I don't know if you could ever measure
> the speed of a DPMI host. How did you do it, anyway ?

For some reason I find that compiling in DOS under CWSDPMI is takes about twice
as long as compiling in Windows under its DPMI server. When compiling under
CWSDPMI, the compilation does more disk thrashing than usual (noticeably more).

--
Johan Venter
ICQ 3643877 - jventer AT writeme DOT com
The TPU DJGPP Interest Group - http://surf.to/djgppig
The RSXNTDJ 1.5 HOWTO - http://surf.to/rsxntdj