Date: Sun, 10 Oct 1999 13:22:28 +0200 (IST)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender: eliz AT is
To: Felix Natter <f DOT natter AT ndh DOT net>
cc: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: problems gcc2.95.1 with binutils 2.81 ?
In-Reply-To: <wkhfk0lvtv.fsf@mail.ndh.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.991010132030.19886M-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


On 9 Oct 1999, Felix Natter wrote:

> does anybody know about problems resulting from
> the use of these two packages ?
> I ask because in gcc2951.txt it says that bnu291 is
> recommended.

``Recommended'', not ``required''.

The reason for the recommendation is because many beta-testers of this 
port use Binutils 2.9.1, so this configuration is better tested.

Binutils 2.8.1 should work just fine.  Make sure you have DJGPP v2.02 
installed, though; that one *is* required (i.e., v2.01 will not work).