From: alainm AT news DOT RISQ DOT QC DOT CA (Alain Magloire)
Subject: Re: Why not DJGPP?
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
References: <7tj71d$e9h$1 AT nnrp1 DOT deja DOT com> <37FD2CC7 DOT F899F64F AT a DOT crl DOT com>
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]
Lines: 19
Message-ID: <0opL3.22744$j6.207955@carnaval.risq.qc.ca>
Date: Fri, 08 Oct 1999 16:57:32 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 132.206.63.174
X-Complaints-To: abuse AT mcgill DOT ca
X-Trace: carnaval.risq.qc.ca 939401852 132.206.63.174 (Fri, 08 Oct 1999 12:57:32 EDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 08 Oct 1999 12:57:32 EDT
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Weiqi Gao (weiqigao AT a DOT crl DOT com) wrote:
: Nicolas Blais wrote:
: > 
: > DJGPP is AWESOME, but why is it that my school pays for WATCOMM C++,
: > is it better?

: They probably don't know.  Tell them and save.

There is simple argument to convice them, Watcomm is dead as a product.
10.6/11.0 is the final and 11.0 will never see the light of day on some
platforms.
If they want a C++ Compiler that will follow the new ISO/C std, it's
time to move on.


--
au revoir, alain
----
Aussi haut que l'on soit assis, on est toujours assis que sur son cul !!!