From: "Charles Sandmann" <sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: Standalone EXEs
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 1999 23:59:35
Organization: Aspen Technology, Inc.
Lines: 21
Message-ID: <37f3f967.sandmann@clio.rice.edu>
References: <3 DOT 0 DOT 5 DOT 32 DOT 19990930175310 DOT 00799570 AT tavultesoft DOT com> <7t09g4$i7m$1 AT solomon DOT cs DOT rose-hulman DOT edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: dcloan.aco.aspentech.com
X-NewsEditor: ED-1.5.8
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

> Andrew Durdin <andy AT tavultesoft DOT com> wrote in message
> news:3 DOT 0 DOT 5 DOT 32 DOT 19990930175310 DOT 00799570 AT tavultesoft DOT com...
> > Is there any way I can create an EXE that doesn't need the separate
> > CWSDPMI.EXE??
> 
> Not yet.

Not exactly true, you can use the PMODE stub.  It's a smaller, faster
ring-0 only dpmi provider - but does not provide virtual memory.

> Mr. Sandmann, would you mind working on this?
> Perhaps write a stub that includes CWSDPMI?

Unfortunately I'm very busy at work, and I am having a hard time getting
time to even complete the testing on the r5 maintenance release.  There is
about 10 hours of fixing 64K real mode memory management issues to merge
the stub and CWSDPMI, and I just have not had the time.  Maybe over 
thanksgiving or christmas - thanksgiving is when I've ended up doing the
last 2 or 3 cwsdpmi releases over the last few years.

Hey, I'm lucky to read the newsgroup once a week anymore...