Date: Wed, 25 Aug 1999 13:31:05 +0300 (IDT)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender: eliz AT is
To: aperes <ajps AT mail DOT telepac DOT pt>
cc: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: Again: I need help (inline assembly)
In-Reply-To: <37c2f6e3.337925@news.telepac.pt>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.990825132954.2834S-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


On Tue, 24 Aug 1999, aperes wrote:

> . Why insist on inline assembly, in the first place?
> 
> Because is fundamental for me. I have wrote many assembly routines
> using turbo assembler but i don't know to port them because the
> protect mode.

You might find out that porting your assembly code to C is easier than 
porting it to inline assembly.  Thus, I think the advice of Hans-Bernhard 
is a good one.