From: "Johan Venter" Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp References: <7psf16$o7j$1 AT nnrp1 DOT deja DOT com> Subject: Re: gcc 2.7.2.1 calls cc1plus.exe instead cc1.exe Lines: 38 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300 X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 Message-ID: <41sw3.4558$ei1.9619@newsfeeds.bigpond.com> Date: Tue, 24 Aug 1999 16:48:11 +1000 NNTP-Posting-Host: 203.40.84.251 X-Trace: newsfeeds.bigpond.com 935480512 203.40.84.251 (Tue, 24 Aug 1999 17:41:52 EST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 24 Aug 1999 17:41:52 EST Organization: Telstra BigPond Internet Services (http://www.bigpond.com) To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com wrote in message news:7psf16$o7j$1 AT nnrp1 DOT deja DOT com... > Dear readers, Dear DJ, > > I work with gcc version 2.7.2.1, (and a Pentium) > I' ve installed djpgg-package and created the > PATH-Variables into autoexec.bat. > GCC runs correctly and completly under Dos 6.22. Why use 2.7.2.1 when 2.95 is already available (and working pretty damn fine)? > I would used a development environment under WIN > NT and I've used the same command line how under > Dos. The only other thing is an pipe of the output > to an file and the using of makros for > substituation of source- and destination files Just to let you know that using DJGPP under Windows NT can produce unexpected results. > I know, that the bin-file cc1plus doesn't exist in > the bin-Path. The correct command line should be > cc1 ...(and so on). > I'd like to compile an C-source file and not an C++-source-file. > I think, that gcc has to be called cc1.exe instead of cc1plus.exe. Well, I certainly have a cc1plus.exe. It's the C++ pre-processor isn't it? As I said, I recommend you upgrade the latest versions of everything (djgpp 2.02 (or 2.03 if you don't mind beta software), gcc 2.95, binutils 2.8.1 etc). -- Johan Venter ICQ 3643877 surf.to/djgppig