Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp Subject: Re: gcc-2.95 and binutils-2.9 From: mhaley99 AT homemail DOT com (Matthew Haley) Organization: Home X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.99.9 (Released Version) (x86 32bit) References: <37B8292B DOT 174C1175 AT americasm01 DOT nt DOT com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=US-ASCII Lines: 33 Message-ID: <9pEu3.175$jp4.19120@news.uswest.net> Date: Wed, 18 Aug 1999 20:08:37 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 209.181.102.71 X-Trace: news.uswest.net 935006917 209.181.102.71 (Wed, 18 Aug 1999 15:08:37 CDT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 18 Aug 1999 15:08:37 CDT To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com You've never had the pleasure of compiling Perl 5 on a 486DX/33MHz w/8MB of RAM have you??? hehe In article , jventer AT writeme DOT com says... > >Campbell, Rolf [SKY:1U32:EXCH] wrote in message >news:37B8292B DOT 174C1175 AT americasm01 DOT nt DOT com... >> Johan Venter wrote: >> >> > Compileing a simple hello world program took 24 seconds with the >following >> > command line: >> > >> > gcc test.c -o test.exe >> >> What system configuration are you using? Win95/98/NT/DOS? How much >RAM? >> Processor speed? If in pure DOS, do you have a RAM disk or disk caching >> software? >> I'm using 2.95 and on my machine it doesn't seem to take any longer >than >> v2.8.1 if I don't specify "-O2". > >I'm running a P166 with 32MB of RAM and Windows 98. >GCC-2.8.1 was always pretty snappy, even if I compiledwith all the >optimizations and speed/space trade off options. > >GCC-2.95 compiles a lot faster than 2.8.1, but the linking takes ages, as I >said before, while running "collect2". > >--