From: "Johan Venter" Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp References: <7oqfvr$qpu$1 AT reader1 DOT wxs DOT nl> <19990815170554 DOT A17468 AT tabor DOT ta DOT jcu DOT cz> <0E16861EE7BCD111BE9400805FE6841F0AF6D76B AT c1s5x001 DOT cor DOT srvfarm DOT origin-it DOT com> Subject: Re: New gcc 2.95 Lines: 31 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 Message-ID: Date: Wed, 18 Aug 1999 11:31:24 +1000 NNTP-Posting-Host: 139.134.161.233 X-Trace: newsfeeds.bigpond.com 934966811 139.134.161.233 (Wed, 18 Aug 1999 19:00:11 EST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 18 Aug 1999 19:00:11 EST Organization: Telstra BigPond Internet Services (http://www.bigpond.com) To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Bas Hamstra wrote in message news:0E16861EE7BCD111BE9400805FE6841F0AF6D76B AT c1s5x001 DOT cor DOT srvfarm DOT origin-it .com... > I think you are right about the bad luck. I found this: > > gcc 2.81 gcc 2.95 CBuilder 4.0 > > - old version of chess program 123a 112a 132a > - new version of chess program - 550b 500b > > a = Positions searched per Second (x1000) > b = Times a sec that all legal moves in a pos are generated (x1000) > > The new version of the program uses a lot of 64 bit integers. > > The strange thing is for program a) gcc 2.95 is slowest, while for b) > it is fastest. Borland other way round. > > So it could very well be that gcc 2.95 is overall faster than 2.81. > > optimation options used: > -o6 -fomit_frame_pointer I suppose that was a typo. It should be -O6 (capital O) -- Johan Venter ICQ 3643877 surf.to/djgppig