Message-ID: <01d801bee5c9$44d5c4c0$12d098cd@co.alachua.fl.us>
From: "Dean Limbaugh" <edl AT ns1 DOT co DOT alachua DOT fl DOT us>
To: <djgpp AT delorie DOT com>
References: <199908131955 DOT PAA23740 AT ns1 DOT co DOT alachua DOT fl DOT us>
Subject: Re: Returned mail: Remote protocol error
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 1999 16:20:21 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

I have a question about this. The word is questions here was part of the
orginal message. If there's a filter that blocked by reply, why where not
the orginal message and it's reply not blocked, since they had the same word
in them. I object to be censored because of a word that was in an orginal
message that was not censored!!!!!

----- Original Message -----
From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <MAILER-DAEMON AT ns1 DOT co DOT alachua DOT fl DOT us>
To: <edl AT ns1 DOT co DOT alachua DOT fl DOT us>
Sent: Friday, August 13, 1999 3:55 PM
Subject: Returned mail: Remote protocol error


> The original message was received at Fri, 13 Aug 1999 15:53:51 -0400
> from dean.co.alachua.fl.us [205.152.208.18]
>
>    ----- The following addresses had delivery problems -----
> <djgpp AT delorie DOT com>  (unrecoverable error)
>
>    ----- Transcript of session follows -----
> ... while talking to delorie.com.:
> >>> DATA
> <<< 500 Hey, offensive language ("*d*a*m*n") is not allowed.
<dj AT delorie DOT com>
> 554 <djgpp AT delorie DOT com>... Remote protocol error
>
>    ----- Original message follows -----
>