Message-ID: <37B31E2E.24D7D864@home.com> From: Trevor Organization: @Home Network X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en]C-AtHome0405 (Win95; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp Subject: Re: Optimization for pentium (pgcc warning) References: <3796313E DOT 7548AFDD AT friko6 DOT onet DOT pl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lines: 27 Date: Thu, 12 Aug 1999 17:16:52 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.112.97.7 X-Complaints-To: abuse AT home DOT net X-Trace: news2.rdc1.on.home.com 934478212 24.112.97.7 (Thu, 12 Aug 1999 10:16:52 PDT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 12 Aug 1999 10:16:52 PDT To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com I have had major problems compiling windows code using mssdk headers using pgcc (1.0.1 I think). The problem was that it was pushing two arguments to TranslateMessage() and DispatchMessage(), and they only take one argument. This lead to a leak of 8 bytes of stack space per message, which causes a mysterious crash a few minutes after starting the program (due to stack overflow). Also, -O6 does enable unstable optimizations. Just read the pgcc faq and see the options labelled as unstable and compare it to the options enabled with -O6 The best commandline for stability is -O6 -fno-loop-after-global -fno-combine-222 -fno-opt-reg-stack -fno-peep-spills although I still had the problem explained above with these options. toudi wrote: > > I have gcc 2.8.1 and it has an option -mpentium, but it does > nothing. > I heard somethin about PGCC. Is it gcc with optimization for > pentium? > Where I can download it from? > > -- > mailto:pienkny AT friko6 DOT onet DOT pl > +4822368951