From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: RHide 1.4 - is there better?
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 1999 15:54:06 +0300
Organization: NetVision Israel	
Lines: 13
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.990812155058.28224D-100000@is>
References: <19990812011506 DOT 14503 DOT 00000339 AT ng-fc1 DOT aol DOT com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: is.elta.co.il
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Trace: news.netvision.net.il 934462385 616 199.203.121.2 (12 Aug 1999 12:53:05 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse AT netvision DOT net DOT il
NNTP-Posting-Date: 12 Aug 1999 12:53:05 GMT
X-Sender: eliz AT is
In-Reply-To: <19990812011506.14503.00000339@ng-fc1.aol.com>
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


On 12 Aug 1999, Legolas10 wrote:

> Hello, I am using DJGPP for C++.  Also using RHide 1.4 as my editor.  Is there
> currently a debugger more suited for c++ than RHide?  If I am in a member
> function, I can't access class variables unless I do this->VARNAME

RHIDE is not in fault here, the problem is with the debug info format 
emitted by the compiler: it simply cannot store all the information 
necessary to debug C++ classes.  You need to use stabs debugging; compile 
your programs with the -gstabs+ switch.

This is explained in the DJGPP FAQ, btw, see section 12.7 there.