From: "Peter Lewerin" <peter DOT lewerin AT krax DOT pp DOT se>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
References: <37A9C270 DOT AF35B1B9 AT megsinet DOT net> <37A9EEC4 DOT C2C957 AT megsinet DOT net>
Subject: SV: RawHIDE
Lines: 13
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2014.211
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2014.211
Message-ID: <KZnq3.2465$i%3.4338@nntpserver.swip.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 130.244.90.13
X-Complaints-To: news-abuse AT swip DOT net
X-Trace: nntpserver.swip.net 933891050 130.244.90.13 (Fri, 06 Aug 1999 00:10:50 MET DST)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 06 Aug 1999 00:10:50 MET DST
Organization: A Customer of Tele2
X-Sender: s-36170 AT dialup90-1-13 DOT swipnet DOT se
Date: Fri, 6 Aug 1999 00:09:01 +0200
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com


> (these two improvements would make DFE the undeniable choice as the best
IDE for DJGPP programming).

Oh yeah?  Correct me if I'm wrong, but DFE still can't run a debugger,
right?  If so, it can't even be considered a candidate for the title.

It's well and good that you love DFE, but try to be a little more objective.
RHIDE is still a more powerful tool than DFE, and like all powerful tools,
it's sometimes hard to use.  Simple does not always equal better, though.