From: noname AT noname DOT org (Stuart Hall) Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp Subject: Re: how compliant? Date: Mon, 07 Jun 1999 20:27:52 GMT Organization: Connix Internet Lines: 40 Message-ID: <37602ad0.6670238@news> References: <375bd1a0 DOT 7891186 AT news> NNTP-Posting-Host: m5.aetna.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.5/32.452 To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com although, I think I just read on the ecgs site that namespaces are implemented in a funky, fake sort of way. I think the next major release of GCC will implement them properly, as well as some other updates (like more efficiency). If anyone knows of a list of where GCC is not compliant I would appreciate it. Eli had a suggestion about the docs that come with the .zip file, but I had no luck there. Stuart On Mon, 07 Jun 1999 14:06:04 GMT, noname AT noname DOT org (Stuart Hall) so kindly spent valuable time writing: >It's also pretty compliant on the C++ front. It can do things like >namespaces (only a recent addition to the ANSI C++ standard). > > >On Sun, 6 Jun 1999 11:33:53 +0300 (IDT), Eli Zaretskii > so kindly spent valuable time writing: > >> >>On Sat, 5 Jun 1999, Tobias Blomkvist wrote: >> >>> Can anyone tell me how ANSI/ISO-compliant the DJGPP-compiler is? >> >>DJGPP is fully compliant with ANSI/ISO C89 standard, and has some of >>the functionality required by the 2 Standard Amendments. > > >---- >Stuart Hall >Connecticut, USA >* return address: f p r i n t f @ i n a m e . c o m * ---- Stuart Hall Connecticut, USA * return address: f p r i n t f @ i n a m e . c o m *