From: Mark Phillips <umphill5 AT cs DOT umanitoba DOT ca>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: another interrupt question
Date: Wed, 26 May 1999 10:37:51 -0500
Organization: The University of Manitoba
Lines: 7
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.96.990526103652.17102A-100000@silver.cs.umanitoba.ca>
NNTP-Posting-Host: silver.cs.umanitoba.ca
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Trace: canopus.cc.umanitoba.ca 927733076 12430 130.179.24.6 (26 May 1999 15:37:56 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: Postmaster AT cc DOT umanitoba DOT ca
NNTP-Posting-Date: 26 May 1999 15:37:56 GMT
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com


if you write an interrupt routine, can you get around locking the
functions it calls by declaring them as inline?  you would still have to
lock any data they access obviously...

mark