Date: Mon, 24 May 1999 12:16:23 +0300 (IDT)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender: eliz AT is
To: Roy Taylor <rtaylor AT nextsteps DOT com>
cc: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: Stack, I think...
In-Reply-To: <19990524054358816.AAA172.170@mike-s-toy>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.990524121321.14456T-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


On Mon, 24 May 1999, Roy Taylor wrote:

> I have a feeling it is the cause of a stack overflow
> of some sort, but I am not sure.  If you have any ideas on how to correct
> this they would be greatly appreciated, if not, do you know of a compiler
> switch to increase the stack size for functions from within DJGPP,
> specifically RHIDE?

Did you look in the FAQ?

Section 12.2 there describes the symptoms of a stack overflow, and gives 
other advice on how to make sense of the crash message printed when the 
program dies.  Section 15.9 explains how to enlarge the runtime stack.