Message-ID: <3745E070.FDB455C7@enter.net> Date: Fri, 21 May 1999 18:38:40 -0400 From: Sean X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.51 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: uclock trouble References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Ronald Landheer wrote: > > >Thanks a lot. :) No, it was more like 70000 uclocks :P cause it would > >count up to around 0x1200 then go down to 0x10000. I'm not converting > >hex in my head, but I think that's around 70000. What you said worked > >great, thanks again. > 0x10000 = 65536 (I do convert hex in my head) > > Greetz! > > Ronald I meant 0x10000 + 0x1200. Do I have to do it just to prove myself? I can't. I tried. I'll type it. 65536 + 4096 + 512 (I can't add those in my without seeing them for some reason) 70144. See, I was really close. Kinda useless to add them since that was just an estimate anyway. But I had to just cause of that. Call it pride or stupidity, same thing sometimes. Sean