From: XXguille AT XXiies DOT XXes (Guillermo Rodriguez Garcia) Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp Subject: Re: STL Date: Tue, 18 May 1999 23:08:59 GMT Organization: Telefonica Transmision de Datos Lines: 20 Message-ID: <37429912.9576636@noticias.iies.es> References: <373B3FD7 DOT 7D692AD2 AT alphalink DOT com DOT au> <373E8A8C DOT 87D93E54 AT earthlink DOT net> <37412752 DOT 914433 AT noticias DOT iies DOT es> <7hpdo5$m6k$1 AT news DOT doit DOT wisc DOT edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: iies224.iies.es Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.5/32.451 To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com El día 17 May 1999 15:48:21 GMT, khan AT xraylith DOT wisc DOT edu (Mumit Khan) escribió: >>Note that while this is true for C, it is not for C++; in which you >>can perfectly define main() as returning void, according to the ISO >>standard. >> > >Wrong. Please check the standard (cf: 3.6.1) before making such >assertions. Ops. Sorry, you are right. void main() is incorrect, in both C and C++ Regards, GUILLE ---- Guillermo Rodriguez Garcia XXguille AT XXiies DOT XXes (ya sabes :-)