Sender: nate AT cartsys DOT com Message-ID: <370FBA58.B2673296@cartsys.com> Date: Sat, 10 Apr 1999 13:53:44 -0700 From: Nate Eldredge X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.08 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.5 i586) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: DJGPP: the future is... FreeDos? DJ-DOS? Linux? References: <3 DOT 0 DOT 1 DOT 16 DOT 19990408222215 DOT 24978170 AT shadow DOT net><7ejuap$q73$1 AT news DOT ececs DOT uc DOT edu><7el3lq$j9k$1 AT nnrp1 DOT dejanews DOT com><7elpkf$5sp$1 AT news DOT ececs DOT uc DOT edu><199904092134 DOT RAA06265 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <3 DOT 0 DOT 1 DOT 16 DOT 19990410085634 DOT 1e57aa0e AT shadow DOT net> <7eo156$nn4$1 AT news DOT ececs DOT uc DOT edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com [Becoming OT] Marvin G Wise Jr wrote: > > > There is only one danger: You must read the instructions for > > partitioning VERY CAREFULLY. You can lose everything you have > > if you don't do what it says. I didn't lose a byte. FIPS is good. > > > > repartitioning of hard drives, what a pain....isn't there a way to setup a > hard drive without having to redo everything? would it be possible, if > someone made a new OS, to allow for compatibility with various file/disk > formats, that way it could be installed without the hassle of > repartitioning? Some Linux distributions support UMSDOS, which is a Real File System hacked on top of MSDOS/FAT (using a magic file to store the stuff (symlinks, permissions, long names, etc) that can't be represented by MSDOS). This way you can drop the Linux stuff in a directory of your DOS drive. However, it's probably not a great idea for the long term; performance isn't the best, and some of the restrictions of MSDOS show through. It's fine if you want to experiment, though. > Another thing, imagine building this OS around a compiler system such as > DJGPP....for example, a user who knows how to program c/c++, wants to add a > new screen saver, so he writes one, then clicks somewher in the GUI "Compile > Screen Saver"....and the OS automatically compiles it into the proper > executable format...this way, people could download opensource screensavers > and the like, without the long wait for binary downloads....and > customization of features would be greatly enhanced...i dont know but it > sounds cool:) Hmm... as far as Linux and other Unix goes, an awful lot of software is distributed as source and is just a matter of configure make make install Not quite automatic, but darn close. -- Nate Eldredge nate AT cartsys DOT com