From: "Marvin G Wise Jr" Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp Subject: Re: DJGPP: the future is... FreeDos? DJ-DOS? Linux? Date: Fri, 9 Apr 1999 19:18:14 -0400 Organization: University of Cincinnati, ECE/CS News Server Lines: 30 Message-ID: <7em1sk$bjj$1@news.ececs.uc.edu> References: <3 DOT 0 DOT 1 DOT 16 DOT 19990408222215 DOT 24978170 AT shadow DOT net> <7ejuap$q73$1 AT news DOT ececs DOT uc DOT edu> <7el3lq$j9k$1 AT nnrp1 DOT dejanews DOT com> <7elpkf$5sp$1 AT news DOT ececs DOT uc DOT edu> <199904092134 DOT RAA06265 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> NNTP-Posting-Host: t07-11.ra.uc.edu X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2014.211 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2014.211 To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Well, I was just saying what I'd like to do :) whether or not we should do it is a matter of opinion...... I do think that the project could possibly see a lot of support ....I mean, look how popular Linux has become, and it's not even a graphical system....I think the biggest hurdle Linux faces these days is the installation procedures...I read an article recently, an opinion article, complaining that linux installation is just too complex for the average user...I wouldn't know, I haven't tried to install it yet:) But, I think that the whole "desktop" with "folders" and such is really out of date in the world of the Internet...which is why linux is so popular (at least this is my perspective.) I mean, a desktop is so small, the internet so large...shouldn't a GUI interface reflect this change? Like I said, I'm just dreaming, and I haven't contributed anything to the current DJGPP project....but I enjoy it's benefits, and appreciate the hard work that's gone into it...right now I'm just supplying what I'd like to see happen in the future:) and what I'd like to be a part of:) if that involves DJGPP great:) if not, I'll end the thread now:) after all, I am a bit longwinded:) WG DJ Delorie wrote in message news:199904092134 DOT RAA06265 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com... > > > but the attraction in this idea is...could we do it... > > The better question to ask, though, is *should* we do it? Or should > we do something else?