From: ams AT ludd DOT luth DOT se (Martin Str|mberg)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: INT in INT handler
Date: 6 Apr 1999 05:43:08 GMT
Organization: University of Lulea, Sweden
Message-ID: <7ec6tc$a1l$1@news.luth.se>
References: <7e7ibo$cr4$3 AT news DOT luth DOT se> <37082B22 DOT B96BA80D AT cartsys DOT com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: queeg.ludd.luth.se
X-Newsreader: TIN [UNIX 1.3 950824BETA PL0]
Lines: 15
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Nate Eldredge (nate AT cartsys DOT com) wrote:
: The INT instruction works even with interrupts disabled.

How can that be? How can I issue an INT when interrupts are disabled?

: Whether the other INT 0x31 handler is okay with having interrupts
: disabled on entry is another question, though.  But I suspect it's
: probably okay.

Aren't interrupts disabled on entry of an interrupt handler?


Arnold, Symphony No. 3,

							MartinS