Date: Tue, 30 Mar 1999 09:22:10 +0200 (IST)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender: eliz AT is
To: Johan Henriksson <johan DOT he AT telia DOT com>
cc: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: DJGPP: the future is... ?
In-Reply-To: <002a01b9fe20$bec83640$a5f9c6c3@johans-dator>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.990330092153.5937G-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from QUOTED-PRINTABLE to 8bit by delorie.com id CAA22646
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


On Thu, 30 Mar 1995, Johan Henriksson wrote:

> >> I have an idéa that I have been thinking of. Why not add a lot
> >> of unstandard useful new C-commands into DJGPP? I know you might
> >> prefer clean ANSI but a lot of fun stuff could be added and would
> >> make more ppl use DJGPP.

Could you please clarify what non-ANSI addition did you want to be
added?  DJGPP already has gobs of non-ANSI stuff, so please give some
examples of what is it that you are missing.