Message-ID: <36FFEDCA.7C4037AD@lycosmail.com> Date: Mon, 29 Mar 1999 16:16:58 -0500 From: Adam Schrotenboer X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.51 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: DJGPP: the future is... ? References: <002901b9fc58$25d90320$6df8c6c3 AT johans-dator> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by oak.oakland.edu id QAA29101 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id QAA30054 Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Johan Henriksson wrote: > I have an idéa that I have been thinking of. Why not add a lot of unstandard > useful new C-commands into DJGPP? I know you might prefer clean ANSI but a > lot of fun stuff could be added and would make more ppl use DJGPP. I could > even help when I get time... When you say adding non-ANSI stuff, do you mean to DJGPP itself, or as an addon pkg? There would probably be some question as to whether or not that is possible. The idea of DJGPP is to maintain portability. Maybe we could make it as an add-on pkg, but it really shouldn't be a part of libc or the DJDEV pkg. At least, we should try to keep the code portable, so that stuff we do for DJGPP is also portable throughout the GNU project.