Message-ID: <001201b9fa34$1cc33d80$b7f9c6c3@johans-dator> From: "Johan Henriksson" To: Subject: Re: Preprocessor hates sizeof Date: Fri, 24 Mar 1995 23:10:44 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.1 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3 Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com from Johan Henriksson, Sweden HTTP://come.to/jhewok | Primary mail: johan DOT he AT telia DOT com #UIN 12035895 Second: jhe75 AT hotmail DOT com Third: johan_he AT yahoo DOT com Leadprogrammer and FX-specialist at Real software http://come.to/real_software ************************************************************************* -----Original Message----- From: Hans-Bernhard Broeker Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Date: Wednesday, March 24, 1999 6:48 PM Subject: Re: Preprocessor hates sizeof >In article you wrote: >> Hi > >> I wonder why the following line does not compile and how to make it work: > >> #if sizeof(long int)==sizeof(int) How do you think that would work!? Of course, a long int != int. Or? > >> (Borland likes it) > >Preprocessors are *not* allowed to like that line. Borland is >violating the definition of C if it accepts that line and does what >you think it should. > >So Borland is in error, here, not DJGPP. > >-- >Hans-Bernhard Broeker (broeker AT physik DOT rwth-aachen DOT de) >Even if all the snow were burnt, ashes would remain. > hm? I thought snow was water. Maybe I should start all over with the chemistry. hm...