From: Dave Bird <dave AT xemu DOT demon DOT co DOT uk>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: Assembler types
Date: Sun, 7 Mar 1999 00:35:53 +0000
Organization: very little
Message-ID: <K76gLzApnc42EwDt@xemu.demon.co.uk>
References: <7bran9$eoh$1 AT news3 DOT infoave DOT net>
 <MxfBZaB97W42Ewiz AT xemu DOT demon DOT co DOT uk> <7bsfcn$2rb$1 AT news3 DOT infoave DOT net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: xemu.demon.co.uk
X-NNTP-Posting-Host: xemu.demon.co.uk:158.152.196.209
X-Trace: news.demon.co.uk 920767004 nnrp-08:7772 NO-IDENT xemu.demon.co.uk:158.152.196.209
X-Complaints-To: abuse AT demon DOT net
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Newsreader: Turnpike (32) Version 4.01  <dQumtnY$x4rJ2u5tL5fS$n2vuP>
Lines: 17
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

In article <7bsfcn$2rb$1 AT news3 DOT infoave DOT net>, Paganini <Nathan E. Banks>
<paganini AT madisontelco DOT com> writes
>Hi...thanks for your reply. I've done some VAX assembler for school...are
>you saying that the difference is in the way the source is arranged in teh
>code file? That they both compile into the same machine instructions? (e.g.,
>i386)

 Oh yes, all produce the same machine code.  But native GNU does it
 in vax-style code "mov $15,%eax" 
 and MASM/NASM in Intel-style "mov eax,15".

-- 
   ^-^-^-@@-^-;-^   http://www.xemu.demon.co.uk/
        (..)__u     news:alt.smoking.mooses