Date: Thu, 11 Feb 1999 16:40:00 +0200 (IST)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender: eliz AT is
To: Marcus Rohrmoser <Marcus DOT Rohrmoser AT lrz-muenchen DOT de>
cc: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: GRX?
In-Reply-To: <36C2E9FF.2F3D7D79@lrz.de>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.990211163542.2822F-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com


On Thu, 11 Feb 1999, Marcus Rohrmoser wrote:

> Yes, this surely is a good idea, but the problem is coordination, for
> most users will know only the few features they use (at least I do so).
> And still only the coders know all the ins and outs.

IMHO, even a list of important functions and a short description what 
each one does together with its prototype is a very good beginning.  
Don't worry about ``all the ins and outs'': people who need this will 
look into the sources anyway ;-).

As for coordination: I would suggest to throw together something you can 
write yourself, based on the features you yourself use, and post the 
draft to the news group.  Then others could send additions to that draft, 
which you could append and make the final version.

> P.S.: If it's worth while (i.e. grx is still in use)

As far as I see from the news group traffic, GRX is pretty much in use.  
Version 2.3 was released relatively recently.