Date: Tue, 2 Feb 1999 20:36:45 -0500 Message-Id: <199902030136.UAA14629@envy.delorie.com> From: DJ Delorie To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com In-reply-to: <3.0.6.32.19990202201308.007fd250@pop.netaddress.com> (message from Paul Derbyshire on Tue, 02 Feb 1999 20:13:08 -0500) Subject: Re: COFF Format (was Re: performance) References: <7981jv$295$1 AT nnrp1 DOT dejanews DOT com> <199902011747 DOT SAA11228 AT acp3bf DOT physik DOT rwth-aachen DOT de> <3 DOT 0 DOT 6 DOT 32 DOT 19990202115636 DOT 00849100 AT pop DOT netaddress DOT com> <199902022104 DOT QAA08963 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <7981jv$295$1 AT nnrp1 DOT dejanews DOT com> <3 DOT 0 DOT 6 DOT 32 DOT 19990202201308 DOT 007fd250 AT pop DOT netaddress DOT com> Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com > Couldn't a stub be made to run PE executables in DOS? Or are they dependent > on having NT kernel functions available? PEs already have an ms-dos stub on them. However, the property that makes them useful (other programs can use them) also makes them native NT programs (they have a PE header in the right place).