Message-Id: <3.0.6.32.19990202160710.0091b8c0@pop.netaddress.com> X-Sender: pderbysh AT pop DOT netaddress DOT com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.6 (32) Date: Tue, 02 Feb 1999 16:07:10 -0500 To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com From: Paul Derbyshire Subject: Re: ASM - function: what should be pushed? In-Reply-To: <199902021815.NAA00632@envy.delorie.com> References: <3 DOT 0 DOT 6 DOT 32 DOT 19990202124127 DOT 00900c10 AT pop DOT netaddress DOT com> <86p4sp5i800 DOT fsf AT vesuri DOT Helsinki DOT FI> <3 DOT 0 DOT 6 DOT 32 DOT 19990202124127 DOT 00900c10 AT pop DOT netaddress DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com At 01:15 PM 2/2/99 -0500, you wrote: >The OS normally runs in ring 0, so no matter what the IOPL is, it can >do I/O. Intel recommends that device drivers run in ring 1 to protect >the OS while allowing I/O, yet protecting the drivers from >applications, which would run in ring 2 or 3. What is ring 2 for, software drivers/servers such as a DPMI server? (CWSDPMI runs in ring 0 though doesn't it?) Where in the name of small purple pixels scattered randomly across the screen after switching to Windows and back did the term 'ring' come from anyways? -- .*. "Clouds are not spheres, mountains are not cones, coastlines are not -() < circles, and bark is not smooth, nor does lightning travel in a `*' straight line." ------------------------------------------------- -- B. Mandelbrot |http://surf.to/pgd.net _____________________ ____|________ Paul Derbyshire pderbysh AT usa DOT net Programmer & Humanist|ICQ: 10423848|