Date: Wed, 6 Jan 1999 13:24:29 -0500 Message-Id: <199901061824.NAA22247@envy.delorie.com> From: DJ Delorie To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com In-reply-to: <8D53104ECD0CD211AF4000A0C9D60AE33CA38F@probe-2.Acclaim-Euro.net> (message from Shawn Hargreaves on Wed, 6 Jan 1999 15:33:16 -0000) Subject: Re: Announce: Allegro 3.1 References: <8D53104ECD0CD211AF4000A0C9D60AE33CA38F AT probe-2 DOT Acclaim-Euro DOT net> Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com > Absolutely, but it seems unfortunate that this should be at the > discretion of the compiler authors rather than the end users. Warnings are at the discretion of the compiler authors, and I expect the list of "things you might want to be aware of" to continue growing as compiler writers get more experience with new standards and new users. *Errors* are usually defined by the ANSI/POSIX/etc specifications (in fact, some warnings are also *required* by ANSI). My advice is to remove -Werror (and maybe -W -Wall) for official distributions, to reduce the number of user complaints, but leave them in for developers.