From: Vic <tudor AT cam DOT org>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: ASM   - DJGPP or NASM??
Date: Wed, 04 Nov 1998 22:29:40 -0500
Organization: Communications Accessibles Montreal, Quebec Canada
Lines: 5
Message-ID: <36411BA4.142E@cam.org>
References: <901B28EBDD5339C7 DOT B24EDDF6C4D6058F DOT BFBD19D847AA4B0E AT library-proxy DOT airnews DOT net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: dialup-473.hip.cam.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0Gold (Win95; I)
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

you can use either one, it doesn't really matter, it's just a matter of
taste. NASM has Intel-like syntax while DJGPP has AT&T syntax. It's not
true that NASM supports only 16 bit code, it supports a lot of different
formats. you can compile DJGPP objects (coff objects) straight from
NASM.