Date: Thu, 29 Oct 1998 19:45:04 +0200 (IST)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender: eliz AT is
To: Olivier Perron <perron AT art DOT alcatel DOT fr>
cc: Andris Pavenis <pavenis AT lanet DOT lv>, djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: DJGPP 2.02 Beta 981027
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.05.9810291511230.2678-100000@rtbsci146tu>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.981029194117.19933W-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com


On Thu, 29 Oct 1998, Olivier Perron wrote:

> Sorry for coming again on this subject, but if I have all undestand, then
> the people who are using gcc-2.8.1 must move the files specs and djgpp.djl
> which comes from DJGPP 2.02 from %DJDIR%/lib to
> %DJDIR%/lib/gcc-lib/djgpp/gcc-2.8.1 .

A better way (IMHO) is to either remove the files from DJDIR/lib/gcc-lib/... 
or rename them.  I also think that gcc distribution should stop coming 
with those files under these names, at least once v2.02 is released.

> If this is correct, then shouldn't it be precised in the readme.1st which
> comes with DJGPP 2.02 ?

It depends when v2.02 is released.  Beta releases are for those who 
should know what they are doing.  When v2.02 is about to be released, I 
think we should consider this issue, and I hope we will find a better 
solution than to mention it in the README (since people tend to not read 
the docs).