From: George Foot <mert0407 AT sable DOT ox DOT ac DOT uk>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: RSXNTDJ & "go32.h", "dpmi.h" header functions
Date: 8 Oct 1998 19:58:13 GMT
Organization: Oxford University, England
Lines: 27
Message-ID: <6vj5gl$e5t$1@news.ox.ac.uk>
References: <Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 981008151631 DOT 1499W-100000 AT is> <361CDF17 DOT 300F AT erols DOT com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: sable.ox.ac.uk
X-Trace: news.ox.ac.uk 907876693 14525 163.1.2.4 (8 Oct 1998 19:58:13 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: newsmaster AT ox DOT ac DOT uk
NNTP-Posting-Date: 8 Oct 1998 19:58:13 GMT
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

On Thu, 08 Oct 1998 11:49:43 -0400 in comp.os.msdos.djgpp John S. Fine
<johnfine AT erols DOT com> wrote:

:   Buried in Cyril's question there is a question I asked about
: a couple times and haven't seen a good answer yet.

:   The ld.exe used by RSXNTDJ doesn't seem to complain about
: unresolved references;  It just builds a bad image.  It is
: very hard to figure out what libraries you are missing if
: you don't even know whether/which symbols are unresolved.

:   I assume I did something wrong in installing RSXNTDJ, or
: there would be a lot more complaints about this problem.
: I am NOT the only one with this problem, because I have
: seen a few other references to it (just no answers).

No, your installation is probably absolutely fine.  The supplied
linker does not complain about unresolved references.  

For most purposes it seems to be fine to use the normal djgpp version
of the linker.  The only time I've found when you need to use
RSXNTDJ's linker is when you're building a DLL.

-- 
george DOT foot AT merton DOT oxford DOT ac DOT uk

xu do tavla fo la lojban  --  http://xiron.pc.helsinki.fi/lojban/lojban.html