From: Boon van der RJ <rjvdboon AT sloep04 DOT cs DOT vu DOT nl>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: Do we have a "ditroff" equivalent in DJGPP?
Date: 24 Sep 1998 08:38:09 GMT
Organization: Fac. Wiskunde & Informatica, VU, Amsterdam
Lines: 15
Message-ID: <6ud0dh$ovq$1@star.cs.vu.nl>
References: <Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 980923175449 DOT 2576G-100000 AT is>
NNTP-Posting-Host: sloep04.cs.vu.nl
User-Agent: tin/pre-1.4-980730 (UNIX) (SunOS/5.5.1 (sun4u))
Originator: rjvdboon AT sloep04 DOT cs DOT vu DOT nl
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Precedence: bulk

Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> wrote:
> On 23 Sep 1998, Boon van der RJ wrote:
>> -Pip2 means to groff: post-process with ip2

> Not as far as I know, it doesn't.  -Pip2 means to groff: pass the 
> post-processor an argument `ip2' (and groff does not prepend - to the 
> argument when it passes it to the post-processor).

Oops, my mistake, I should read the manpages more carefully.
Sorry,
 Robert

-- 
rjvdboon AT cs DOT vu DOT nl        | "En dat is niet waar!" sprak ex-Staatsecretaris-
www.cs.vu.nl/~rjvdboon   |    van-Onderwijs Netelenbos fel.