Message-Id: <199809230231.WAA13983@indy.delorie.com> Comments: Authenticated sender is From: "George Foot" To: duncanburch AT my-dejanews DOT com Date: Wed, 23 Sep 1998 01:42:31 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Subject: Re: grc isnt working Reply-to: mert0407 AT sable DOT ox DOT ac DOT uk CC: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On 22 Sep 98 at 20:48, duncanburch AT my-dejanews DOT com wrote: > In article <199809220110 DOT CAA05806 AT rochefort DOT ns DOT easynet DOT net>, > mert0407 AT sable DOT ox DOT ac DOT uk wrote: > > I'd be interested to know just what you did to make it work > > with gcc v2.8.1. Was it awkward? The reason I ask is that > > gcc v2.8.1 needs a special djgpp.env doesn't it? RSXNTDJ's > > djgpp.env is based on older gcc versions. Any changes to > > `lib/specs' for gcc v2.8.1 would have the same problem because > > RSXNTDJ needs its own changes to the specs. > > I just modified the existing djgpp.env file and added all of the extra > directorys etc. manually. I took a bit of messing around, and gave me some > very strange errors whilst I was trying to get it working, but it now works > perfectly. If you want i'll email you the config file, which could save time > arsing around. No, thanks, not to me anyway. I just wanted to know roughly what was involved. I use gcc 2.7.2.1 and binutils 2.7, so I had no incompatibility problems with RSXNTDJ at all. Although, I think maybe if the RSXNTDJ author isn't around at the moment it would be good to work out a new djgpp.env for RSXNTDJ with gcc 2.8.1, and also to compile a new ld.exe (using the patch in the RSXNTDJ distribution) based on binutils 2.8.1 (or whatever the latest version is). Plus Doug Gale has his patch to the specs, and I have a patch to dllexp.c. It would be better if we could contact the author though, so that he could coordinate it all. -- george DOT foot AT merton DOT oxford DOT ac DOT uk