From: "Arthur" <arfa AT clara DOT net>
To: "DJGPP Mailing List" <djgpp AT delorie DOT com>, <colskywalker AT thepentagon DOT com>
Subject: RE: DJGPP and MMX
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 1998 14:24:12 +0100
Message-ID: <000101bdd5ab$cf06dfa0$974d08c3@arfa>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <35EB9502.B93A8B06@mindspring.com>
Precedence: bulk

Is there an optimisation (like -mpentium) to optimise for the MMX? MMX
technology speeds up loops immensly and I'd love to see the speed difference
in my programs. If there isn't, then it should be on the thist of things to
do...

James Arthur
jaa AT arfa DOT clara DOT net
ICQ#15054819


> the last information i recieved was that, yes they are available, and
> the 'PADD' bug i _believe_ has been fixed form what i've read, but i
> could be mistaken.
>
> Rodrigo M. Cabrera wrote:
>
> > Hi there
> >
> > Does DJGPP inline assembly support MMX set of instructions?