Comments: Authenticated sender is <mert0407 AT sable DOT ox DOT ac DOT uk>
From: "George Foot" <george DOT foot AT merton DOT oxford DOT ac DOT uk>
To: Isaac Waldron <waldroni AT lr DOT net>
Date: Sun, 23 Aug 1998 23:50:13 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Subject: Re: Recompiling libc and libm.
Reply-to: george DOT foot AT merton DOT oxford DOT ac DOT uk
CC: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Message-Id: <E0zAiz6-0003r3-00@sable.ox.ac.uk>
Precedence: bulk

On 23 Aug 98 at 17:58, Isaac Waldron wrote:

> I've been trying to recompile the libc and libm libraries with pgcc-2.90.23
> 980102 (egcs-1.0.1 release).  Anyway, I'm having a problem with the
> assembler not running the .S files through the preprocessor first.  I think
> it stems from the fact that the actual extension for the assembler files is
> ".s"  Has anyone else had this problem?  Otherwise, does anyone know where I
> can get a distribution with the correct extensions?

Which libc source distribution are you using?  The v2.01 source used
a rather awkward building system.  The v2.02 alphas have a much
tidier system; you just need to do a small amount of configuring and
then run Make.  However, v2.02 is not fully released yet so some
parts of it may not be completely stable.

-- 
george DOT foot AT merton DOT oxford DOT ac DOT uk