Date: Wed, 12 Aug 1998 17:15:55 +0300 (IDT)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
To: Ian Chapman <Ian DOT Chapman DOT ichapman AT nt DOT com>
cc: "'djgpp AT delorie DOT com'" <djgpp AT delorie DOT com>
Subject: Re: split and merge
In-Reply-To: <915C65C50371D11187AD0000F881B9A44B4846@bcarua62.ca.nortel.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.980812171223.366D-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Precedence: bulk


On Wed, 12 Aug 1998, Ian Chapman wrote:

> I pulled over cc16e403.exe from Netscape and split it
> into 10 files of 1405k ... cc16e403.AA to AJ.  Not 000 per the djgpp info.

That's because your `split.exe' isn't the one from djdev201, it is most 
probably from the GNU Textutils package.

DJGPP v2.02 renames its split.exe to djsplit.exe, and merge.exe to 
djmerge.exe, to avoid these problems.

> 	So I'm reporting a minor bug if BASE.000 is not there merge fails
> ungracefully

Noted.  Thanks for the bug report.

> merge.exe	37,376	10-31-96	7:14p
> split.exe	61,952	02-01-97	7:08p ... are these the right
> vintages?

No, split.exe from djdev should be also dated 10-31-96 (that's the date 
of DJGPP 2.01 release).