Message-ID: <35CA6D53.45DBFFE1@geocities.com> From: Merlin MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp Subject: Re: allegro == or != programming References: <35C42D12 DOT C9D01BA1 AT geocities DOT com> <35c967e0 DOT 17829184 AT news DOT Austria DOT EU DOT net> <35C8166C DOT 9B3423CA AT geocities DOT com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lines: 40 Date: Fri, 07 Aug 1998 03:01:02 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 223-cy-wpg.ilos.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 06 Aug 1998 22:01:02 CDT Organization: MBnet Networking Inc. To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Precedence: bulk Michael Lam wrote: > Having seen so many posts, I'm glad that this thread does not seem to be a > war =) As am I. :-) > > > My opinion is, if your aim is to learn, try to hack as much as you can > learn. Altho computer systems changes from hour to hour, the underlying > basic priniple has only slightly changed since 70s. So, in the long run, > you earn no matter how the world changes. > > However, if your concern at this moment is productivity, do not reinvent > anything - I dare say Allegro is enough for most DOS multimedia programs - > even if you do not know what's going on underneath. > The point is, let division of labour work for you while your software > expand more in scale than in complexity. > > Allegro is just another layer of hardware abstraction - the gift we have > all been enjoying from DOS, DJGPP, and even Assembly language. Perhaps 10 > years later, what we have all been arguing now won't even be a > question. The Java force shows that very clearly (VB? Heaven forbid!) > Maybe in a year we'll all be arguing about Allegro vs. CASE (where the > computer itself helps to program). > > All in all, this is a progress of abstraction. I personally see no > problem to it, as long as the underlying layers are reliable and robust, > and the hardware is fast enough. Yes.. I suppose it is all just the process of abstraction... Thanks for your opinion... L8r. Merlin.