From: myknees AT aol DOT com (Myknees)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: Optimised Allegro
Lines: 18
Message-ID: <1998080702102800.WAA20627@ladder03.news.aol.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ladder03.news.aol.com
Date: 07 Aug 1998 02:10:27 GMT
References: <19980803 DOT 224756 DOT 6494 DOT 0 DOT matthew DOT krause AT juno DOT com>
Organization: AOL http://www.aol.com
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Precedence: bulk

I'm using gcc version 2.7.2.1, and for me the Allegro switches milk gcc for the
most optimization that it can give for the system you describe.  For you, since
you use a later version of gcc, you can read specifics on its optimization
switches with the info browser:

info gcc invoking optim

--Ed (Myknees)

In article <19980803 DOT 224756 DOT 6494 DOT 0 DOT matthew DOT krause AT juno DOT com>,
matthew DOT krause AT juno DOT com writes:

[snip]
>However, I'm running on A P166. Short of getting PGCC, is there a way to
>optmise Allegro? I remember reading on this newsgroup something about a
>switch like -march586. I'm using GCC version 2.8.1. Anyone feel like
>reminding me? Thanks.