From: "John S. Fine" <johnfine AT erols DOT com>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: Inline assembly
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 1998 10:45:45 -0400
Organization: RCN Internet
Lines: 21
Message-ID: <35C08719.561B@erols.com>
References: <01bdbb47$fdb4d240$0100007f AT localhost>
Reply-To: johnfine AT erols DOT com
NNTP-Posting-Host: 207-172-241-202.s11.as8.bsd.erols.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Precedence: bulk

Austin Clements wrote:

> Is there any way to do inline assembly in DJGPP and not
> have to resort to writing full-fledged assembly?  (I've looked at .s files
> before and wished I hadn't)

  If you didn't like what you saw in .s files, you probably
won't like inline assembly either.  If good documentation
would help, look at:

http://www.rt66.com/~brennan/djgpp/bgtia.html

  If you don't like AT&T syntax and prefer Intel syntax, you
should look at NASM instead (see my webpage).  With NASM you
would need to write whole .asm files (rather than inline),
but the sytax is cleaner and linking with djgpp C code is
fairly well documented.

-- 
http://www.erols.com/johnfine/
http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Peaks/8600/