From: rjvdboon AT cs DOT vu DOT nl (Boon van der RJ)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: Sound libs 4 DJGPP
Date: 22 Jul 1998 09:38:02 GMT
Organization: Fac. Wiskunde & Informatica, VU, Amsterdam
Lines: 21
Message-ID: <6p4btq$bre$1@star.cs.vu.nl>
References: <35B58218 DOT BA040281 AT logic-gate DOT com> <35B5AAB0 DOT 459BF813 AT calderauk DOT com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: sloep41.cs.vu.nl
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Precedence: bulk

JP Morris (jmorris AT calderauk DOT com) wrote:
> It's difficult to recompile the thing in pure DOS, you'll need a very
> good DPMI server.  If you work in a win95 DOS box, that should be ok.
  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^                    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Isn't this a contradiction;-? Or do you mean a DPMI server that doesn't
care to much about de-referencing NULL-pointers? (which IMHO isn't a
_good_ DPMI server)

If you have reasons why win95-dos-box is better than CWSDPMI, I would
be highly interested. (or what are the problems compiling midas?)

Greetings,
 Robert.

PS. this is not intended as a flame, or a personal attack, but I would
    really like to know why win95 is better. Hmmm, while thinking
    about it, I use win95, even while I think it's worse than DOS in
    most respects. (can't we just switch back to the C64 again ;-).
-- 
rjvdboon AT cs DOT vu DOT nl        | "En dat is niet waar!" sprak (ex?) Staatsecre-
www.cs.vu.nl/~rjvdboon   |    taris Netelenbos (onderwijs) fel.