From: Eyal Ben-David <eyal DOT ben-david AT aks DOT com>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: "vsscanf" - Is there an equivalent in DJGPP?
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 1998 16:55:46 +0300
Organization: AKS
Lines: 16
Message-ID: <35B49DE2.27BE@aks.com>
References: <Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 980721114432 DOT 6992W-100000 AT is>
NNTP-Posting-Host: pathfinder.aladdin.co.il
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Precedence: bulk

Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> 
> On Mon, 20 Jul 1998, Krian U wrote:
> 

[ ... ]

> 
> You don't actually mean ``doesn't compile'', you mean ``doesn't link'',
> right?  The compiler doesn't really care about functions which are or
> aren't in the library.

In C++ compilation it is ``doesn't compile'' since the compiler can't
see a declaration for the function. 

Eyal.