Date: Thu, 16 Jul 1998 13:11:52 +0300 (IDT)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
To: Jorge Ivan Meza Martinez <jimeza AT usa DOT net>
cc: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject: RE: Questions
In-Reply-To: <01bdb01d$ffd2ff00$LocalHost@default>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.980716131131.17398G-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Precedence: bulk


On Wed, 15 Jul 1998, Jorge Ivan Meza Martinez wrote:

> your interesting answer made me a little doubt, then I think that gxx from
> gpp281b.zip overwrote the gxx from djdev201.zip; so, what about if I unzip
> djdev201.zip again ? at this way I would compile with out -lgpp parameter,
> isn't it ?

Yes, gxx from djdev will free you from the need to add -lgpp.

I suggest to rename gxx.exe from gpp281b.zip to gpp.exe, and then
unzip gxx.exe from djdev again.  This way, you have both of the
programs (they have different functionality) and could use either one
as the need arises.

> which one is better -O or -O2 ( or what is the difference ? ) ?

I use -O2 almost always.  The differences are documented in the GCC
manual (type "info gcc invoking optimize" from the DOS prompt), they
are too long to reproduce here.