Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
From: fredex AT fcshome DOT stoneham DOT ma DOT us (Fred Smith)
Subject: Re: A vi for BASH?
Organization: None!
Message-ID: <Ew4sFC.GBw@fcshome.stoneham.ma.us>
References: <3 DOT 0 DOT 1 DOT 16 DOT 19980714163232 DOT 27b7a556 AT shadow DOT net> <6ogiaq$p8m AT hacgate2 DOT hac DOT com>
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 1998 10:14:00 GMT
Lines: 29
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Precedence: bulk

John Velman (jrvelman AT mail DOT hac DOT com) wrote:
: In article <3 DOT 0 DOT 1 DOT 16 DOT 19980714163232 DOT 27b7a556 AT shadow DOT net>, ralphgpr AT shadow DOT net 
: says...
: >
: >I got BASH working good on top of command.com.
: [snip]
: >Or to look at it another way, is there ANY vi you would recommend for BASH?
: >
: >Any suggestions would be appreciated.

: Try vim ("vi improved").   The home page is 

While there's nothing wrong with VIM, there's also nothing wrong with
Elvis. I use Elvis (version 2.x) on top of bash all the time. What version
of Elvis are you using? If it's still 1.x, I suggest you go to:

	ftp://ftp.cs.pdx.edu/pub/elvis/unreleased

and get the DOS executable package for the current Elvis beta (last I
noticed it was 2.1i). I use 2.1i on several platforms, daily, and find
it to be stable (for my uses, at least).

Fred
--
---- Fred Smith -- fredex AT fcshome DOT stoneham DOT ma DOT us -----------------------------
               But God demonstrates his own love for us in this: 
                         While we were still sinners, 
                              Christ died for us.
------------------------------- Romans 5:8 (niv) ------------------------------