Reply-To: "Jorge Ivan Meza Martinez" From: "Jorge Ivan Meza Martinez" To: "Eli Zaretskii" Cc: Subject: RE: Questions Date: Wed, 15 Jul 1998 13:25:47 -0500 Message-ID: <01bdb01d$ffd2ff00$LocalHost@default> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk Hi, thank you for your help, >It depends where did your gxx.exe come from. If it's from gpp281b.zip, >then I think it doesn't. gxx.exe from djdev201.zip (which is an entirely >different program) *does* link in libgpp. > >Personally, I think it's *very* unfortunate that gpp281b.zip called >another program by the same name gxx.exe. It confuses people, since the >FAQ and README.1ST mention gxx.exe as well, but they mean gxx.exe from >djdev201. I think gpp281b.zip should rename it to gpp.exe instead. your interesting answer made me a little doubt, then I think that gxx from gpp281b.zip overwrote the gxx from djdev201.zip; so, what about if I unzip djdev201.zip again ? at this way I would compile with out -lgpp parameter, isn't it ? >This is explained in the FAQ (section 8.10): some functions are declared >inline on the headers which define them, and don't have compiled versions >inside the library. But inlining is disabled unless you use -O, so your >program winds up without these functions, and the linker complains. which one is better -O or -O2 ( or what is the difference ? ) ? >Emacs isn't just an editor, it's a programming environment and a way of >life ;-). >> is it good ? >Extremely good, and full of features. I didn't understand it, then I will read more. BIG thanks to you, your help was very useful. jorge ivan meza martinez http://members.xoom.com/THP jimeza AT usa DOT net -----Original Message----- De: Eli Zaretskii Para: Jorge Ivan Meza Martinez CC: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Fecha: Martes 14 de Julio de 1998 10:08 PM Asunto: Re: Questions