From: Endlisnis <s257m AT unb DOT ca>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: About DJGPP v2.02
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 1998 17:11:15 -0300
Organization: University of New Brunswick
Lines: 16
Message-ID: <Pine.SOL.3.96.980708170725.3501A-100000@sol.sun.csd.unb.ca>
References: <Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 980708114745 DOT 5286M-100000 AT is>
NNTP-Posting-Host: sol-alt1.unb.ca
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.980708114745.5286M-100000@is>
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, 8 Jul 1998, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
->> >Perhaps you can profile the code and find just what was so slow in the
->> >previous version, then ask specifically.
->> Yes, I profiled it and all the time is wasted whit __dpmi_int, as the
->> 13.5 in the FAQ says.
	I use rhide to compile my code.  Could someone tell me how to set
rhide to create exe's that make profiling information OR tell me the
commandline equivalent?
	The FAQ says to use "-pg" as a switch to the compiler AND the
linker, but if I set that as a linker option in rhide, it says
"f:/djgpp/bin\ld.exe: unrecognized option `-pg'".  And I know the FAQ says
not to use ld.exe directly, but I don't know how else.

	Endlisnis
[I have a pyramid of wingyness]