Date: Tue, 30 Jun 1998 16:19:06 +0300 (IDT)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
To: Ian Miller <itmiller AT dera DOT gov DOT uk>
cc: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: ...and now problem when trying to recompile libm.a !
In-Reply-To: <87k95zb19g.fsf@hasn.dera.gov.uk>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.980630161536.7733D-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Precedence: bulk


On 30 Jun 1998, Ian Miller wrote:

> My copy of patch doesn't understand the lines like that in your patch.
> I'm running a version released a few months ago and I think there may
> have been a new one since. Should I upgrade or is there something
> wrong with you patch?

No, `patch' was not upgraded since last September, and it shouldn't have
problems with such lines.

It might be that my unexec.c is different from yours because I did it in 
the pretest of Emacs 20.3.  Other than that, there should be no problems 
at all.  If you think the problem is real, please tell me what did 
`patch' say when you invoked it on the original patch file, and how 
exactly did you invoke it.

And thanks for reporting and testing this problem.  The patch is now in 
the Emacs development tree.